2008 Woodie Awards
Similarities drawn between Iraq and Vietnam
Ian Pajer Rogers, Sophomore, Political science
Issue date: 4/16/04 Section: Opinion
- Page 1 of 2 next >
As violent outbursts break out in Iraq, media comparisons of Iraq and Vietnam abound in both liberal and conservative outlets. This op-ed is no exception.
The April 6-8 offensive by U.S. troops in Falluja in efforts to "pacify" those who are or support "terrorists" is reminiscent of similar raids in South Vietnam. These raids target the enemy and those who harbor the enemy. The first U.S. strike in Falluja came by air as U.S. warplanes dropped "bombs on a residential area of the town" as payback for the murder and sickening dismemberment of four American civilian contractors the previous week. The ground fighting then turned fierce. After two days of combat Lt. Col. Brennan Byrne described the operation as "the most intense kind of fighting. . . this is like Hue City in Vietnam," referring to a battle in the 1968 Tet Offensive.
If a comparison to Vietnam is to be extracted from Iraq, it should be to the early years of Vietnam. For every minute of the Nixon administration, one ton of explosives were dropped on Vietnam under order of the Nixon administration. We are not to this point in Iraq, clearly, but it is useful to see where we could end up if we are not careful. By November, 2003 the number of Americans killed in Iraq surpassed the number killed in Vietnam from 1962-1964. Make no mistake, Iraq could be another Vietnam given some time.
A clear similarity between Iraq and Vietnam is the use of language by the U.S. The rhetoric is different: In Iraq we fight terrorists; in South Vietnam we fought communists. But the application of such terms is the same. This framework is spelled out in the Bush Doctrine very plainly: If you are not for the U.S. you are against the U.S. This translates into tough policy for the occupied peoples. There is no space for a reasonable Iraqi or a Vietnamese to oppose what they may perceive as two evils: the occupation and the removed tyrant. If they openly oppose the occupation, they are labeled terrorists or communists, respectively. This label gives the U.S. a certain moral latitude in fighting the enemy or enemy abettors, hence the use of chemical warfare in Vietnam and the residential air raids in Iraq.
The April 6-8 offensive by U.S. troops in Falluja in efforts to "pacify" those who are or support "terrorists" is reminiscent of similar raids in South Vietnam. These raids target the enemy and those who harbor the enemy. The first U.S. strike in Falluja came by air as U.S. warplanes dropped "bombs on a residential area of the town" as payback for the murder and sickening dismemberment of four American civilian contractors the previous week. The ground fighting then turned fierce. After two days of combat Lt. Col. Brennan Byrne described the operation as "the most intense kind of fighting. . . this is like Hue City in Vietnam," referring to a battle in the 1968 Tet Offensive.
If a comparison to Vietnam is to be extracted from Iraq, it should be to the early years of Vietnam. For every minute of the Nixon administration, one ton of explosives were dropped on Vietnam under order of the Nixon administration. We are not to this point in Iraq, clearly, but it is useful to see where we could end up if we are not careful. By November, 2003 the number of Americans killed in Iraq surpassed the number killed in Vietnam from 1962-1964. Make no mistake, Iraq could be another Vietnam given some time.
A clear similarity between Iraq and Vietnam is the use of language by the U.S. The rhetoric is different: In Iraq we fight terrorists; in South Vietnam we fought communists. But the application of such terms is the same. This framework is spelled out in the Bush Doctrine very plainly: If you are not for the U.S. you are against the U.S. This translates into tough policy for the occupied peoples. There is no space for a reasonable Iraqi or a Vietnamese to oppose what they may perceive as two evils: the occupation and the removed tyrant. If they openly oppose the occupation, they are labeled terrorists or communists, respectively. This label gives the U.S. a certain moral latitude in fighting the enemy or enemy abettors, hence the use of chemical warfare in Vietnam and the residential air raids in Iraq.
