Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Another View: Occupying Huddleston Hall Ballroom – nothing accomplished at open forum

Published: Monday, December 5, 2011

Updated: Monday, December 5, 2011 23:12

 

Is UNH backing Occupy Wall Street? That seemed to be the message of the event hosted by the UNH Administration in Huddleston Hall last Wednesday. The event began with a largely leftist panel of speakers addressing attendees with bromides glorifying OWS.

Professor Bruce Mallory began the discussion by praising "the movement" as "largely peaceful." Throughout his remarks, he continued to emphasize the fact that OWS is "nonviolent."

This, we thought, was a strange way for a man with a Ph.D. to describe a "movement" which has facilitated acts of rape, murder and theft while costing tax payers millions of dollars in vandalism and obstructing the activity of private businesses that employ countless Americans.

Consider these actions in comparison to those of the Tea Party movement, which always obtained a permit, never required police presence, and never facilitated criminal activity. Given this, it is strange that the university administration never got around to holding a forum gratifying that movement.

After brief remarks by university President Mark Huddleston, who, for his part, remained neutral, UNH student-cum-Peace and Justice League leader Alex Freid took the podium. He began his remarks by noting that, like the national movement, the UNH chapter of Occupy Wall Street has no official spokesman.

This we found fallacious in view of the fact that an "anonymous" student-run twitter account, @OccupyUNH, has been using its large following to direct and organize "the movement" here on campus. He went on to discuss corporate backing of the university, commenting that the university should gladly welcome "the movement" in view of this unscrupulous funding source.

He never quite got around, however, to describing how "the movement" plans to adequately fund the university after they chase our benefactors out of town. He concluded his remarks by praising the university for opening this "dialogue."

Next to speak was Associate Professor Nick Smith, who made a number of outrageous statements. Among them, that "the movement" was "otherwise unaffiliated, politically" (one wonders how he feels about endorsements of the movement by, among others, President Obama, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and Massachusetts Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren).

Furthermore, he went on to discuss the globalization of the  movement by saying that the United States should share a bigger piece of the "American pie" with the less fortunate world (how much does the United States spend in global aid annually, Professor Smith?).

He finished his remarks by thanking Alex Freid for his leadership of the "leaderless" UNH OWS chapter.

Finally, a seemingly uncomfortable Executive Director of Public Safety Paul Dean only commented, respectfully, that Occupy UNH has the right to peacefully assemble, but that the UNH police has guidelines that the group must follow. He ended his statement by opining that he planned to enforce these guidelines.

Following the panel, "the assembly," struggling to stay warm and well hydrated in the Zuccotti Park-like atmosphere that was the Huddleston Hall ballroom, broke into groups to "discuss" predetermined and clearly biased questions. Questions included: "how does the Occupy Movement connect to the interests of students?" "Do universities carry any special responsibilities when a movement such as OWS develops?" And "what are your views about a movement that is ‘leaderless?'"

These groups consisted largely of unhinged and clearly liberal humanities professors, excess administrators attempting to justify their existence, and students who, in all seriousness, would have been better off staying home and curling up with an economics textbook. Seemingly absent from the discussion were WSBE and political science professors who might have provided a refreshing degree of factuality to the discussion.

The assembly ended with these groups sending representatives on stage to read off lists of unrealistic demands fueled by a naïve understanding of basic human nature and based in a fantastic, but sadly nonexistent, reality.

Last week's Occupy UNH reception was truly a night to remember.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

9 comments

Anonymous
Thu Dec 15 2011 21:09
To UNH Alumni:

I take it you've not had the pleasure of reading the indepth and insightful works of Mr. Mignanelli before? Well let me tell you, if there's one person who knows what's best for others and how the world works it's a sheltered Poli Sci major from a small town in Northern New Hampshire. You should probably listen to him.

Anonymous
Sun Dec 11 2011 20:32
Keep it up, Nicky. Keep making the GOP look like morons. You're making the rest of us look good! Thanks. :)
Parent
Sun Dec 11 2011 17:28
Elliot GAULT?

Really, Mr. Gault.

It feels like the Dungeons and Dragons crowd (dressing up, playacting, renaming oneself), grew up and read Ayn Rand, and is leaping into the vault of vitriol that culminates in Breitbart and his minion who dresses up and tries to nab those bad, bad lefties. You know, the demons. Vitriol and stupidity, a terrible combination. Where are the smart student writers to refute this claptrap?

It is scary when a student newspaper is so often full of this terrible writing. As a prospective student, I would read it and conclude it isn't a place for intellectual inquiry. Why is this paper so consistently full of such awful writing?

UNH Alumni
Sat Dec 10 2011 01:21
A poorly researched and childishly worded op-ed that is more like a whining plea than a professional statement. You're the face of UNH today? Wow, the school has changed a bit from when I was there not even six years ago.
Anonymous
Sat Dec 10 2011 00:59
I understand that this in a student newspaper, but this piece reads more like spam than an editorial.
You have a right to be critical about OWS, but put invest some time and effort in your work.
Stop being lazy.
Jimminy
Fri Dec 9 2011 23:04
Aw heck...Talk is cheap and there's plenty of it,so let'em talk.
Pete Gaeta
Fri Dec 9 2011 10:11
This article is an example of the kind of snarky, divisive, insubstantial dialog that is antithetical to everything the Occupy Movement is about. Instead of engaging your readers in a thoughtful way, you take pot shots aimed at discrediting and casting in a bad light people who are actively concerned about the future of our country. You seem to have no qualms about using heavy spin and outright falsehoods to further your political viewpoint. These tactics have achieved some political success over the past 20 years, but America is tired of it. I have seen people from the left, right and center come together and find common ground as part of Occupy, and one thing is clear - we are all sick and tired of our lives and our future being held hostage to the political cage-match that goes on continuously in our media and our Congress. It's a new day, my friend. Lead, follow or get the hell out of the way.
Anonymous
Thu Dec 8 2011 20:07
1. Does it really bother you so that people, and the administration, got together to DISCUSS something relevant to ongoing events in this country? Whether you support or loathe occupy, your outright hostility to it being discussed is bizarre.

2. "rape, murder and theft". Please, tone down the hyperbole. Occupy hasn't been spotless by any means but you're peddling clear falsehoods here.

3. If you'd like such a discussion with economics and poli sci professors? Why not organize one? Why not organize a dialogue between both elements of the school? It'd likely prove quite interesting for all involved.

4. Calm down with the personal attacks on the professors and students with whom you share a community here at the University. Your hostility towards your fellow students can get sort of unsettling, relax and lay off the ideological hatred every once in a while.

Scott Chesney
Tue Dec 6 2011 04:59
A most interesting perspective. Your take actually represents part of the type of viewpoint the authors of the event anticipated would and should emerge as part of or as areaction to this educationally inspired event. Personally, I think your perspective is strong enough without the personal attacks aimed at the plannerscand speakers.






log out