Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Editorial: Back in a flash

Professor who exposed himself to return to teaching

The New Hampshire

Published: Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Updated: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 16:02

Larkin

Larkin

German professor Edward Larkin will be returning to campus this spring and teaching classes next fall, according to an article that appeared on page 5 of today's issue of The New Hampshire.

Perhaps you remember the name. He's the professor who showed his penis to a mother and teenager in the parking lot of a grocery store. He then proceeded to drive down Route 101 with his genitals hanging out of his zipper as he cruised on his motorcycle.

When police pulled him over, his genitals were still hanging out.

And, UNH students, this pervert could be your professor next fall.

Larkin's actions are mind numbing. Equally mind numbing, though, are the actions of the Foreign Language Department in the time since the 2009 incident.

Just read what Marco Dorfsman, the chair of the Department of Languages, Literatures and Cultures had to say about Larkin.

"While I recognize this is a difficult and awkward situation, I believe we can all get past it and move on to what matters more: teaching, learning and scholarship in our academic community," Dorfsman said. "He is an effective and inspiring teacher; I have no concerns about him being in the classroom."

Really, professor Dorfsman?

What matters more is teaching? More than a grown man who exposes his penis and shows it to teenage girls in public?

Guess where Larkin will be next fall? Surrounded by teenage girls and young women. The thought of that is disgusting.

Put yourself in the shoes of a parent sending his or her young daughter to college. A week into her experience, you find out she's sitting five feet away from a man who pled guilty to indecent exposure three times a week.

And what can you do at that point? The department has his back, after all.

That's why we're recommending that all students boycott his course when he resumes standing in front of classrooms next fall.

Perhaps that is what it will take to remove Larkin from the faculty.

Don't blame administration – President Mark Huddleston and Co. tried to dismiss Larkin from his teaching position following his arrest. They cited "professional incompetence, deliberate neglect of duty or moral delinquency of a grave order" as reasons to dismiss the professor. Sounds accurate.

Larkin appealed and the case was brought before arbitrator Michael Ryan who decided that Larkin's act was not delinquency of a "grave order," and UNH didn't have the right to dismiss Larkin.

If a professor knowingly and deliberately showing his genitals to young women doesn't count as a "grave order," it's frightening to think of what else isn't "grave" enough.

We just hope we don't have to find out.

By not only keeping Larkin on staff, but also allowing him to enter classrooms again, the arbitrator and foreign language department have opened the floodgates to more professor perversion.

We hope the department wakes up and has the good sense to pull his courses next fall.

And if they don't, it's on the students. Don't sign up for his course. Send the department a message. At some point, they'll have to realize teaching doesn't come before actions like his.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

21 comments

Anonymous
Wed Nov 16 2011 16:52
It baffles me why the university never settled with this guy off court. really, so stingy?! He's in the national news, thats a huge stain on the university prestige, they'll lose more in endowment money. But hey, its UNH - don't expect to make sense.
Anonymous
Tue Oct 4 2011 15:14
"it's a penis, really. grow up."

That's UNH for you. Sexual harrassment? Who cares? KEYSTONE LIGHT!

Anonymous
Fri Sep 23 2011 12:47
This person was seen sitting in a parking lot just off the Newington Mall, in the area of buisnesses. When my daughter came out of work his car was parked between hers and another. She screamed at him when she saw that as he sat there parked between two cars that he was nude from the waist down with a shirt on that was completely unbuttoned. He was talking on the cell phone, when she screamed he threw a paper over himself and left. She reported this to mall security giving them his plate, make and model along with a description of him. Nothing was ever done, though the police did call her, they knew who he was and nothing ever came of it. Young women everywhere are in danger from this creep, one day exposing himself won't do it for him anymore, is UNH waiting for that to happen before they act?
Anonymous
Fri Sep 23 2011 11:59
The university sustained the largest single budget cut to an institution of higher learning in the history of the United States, and THIS is what TNH's first editorial of the year is about? Where are stories about the budget cuts, about the state legislature and how this happened, about how the university is responding, about the implications for the future of UNH? Please don't fall into the Fox News trap of focusing on the salacious, sensationalistic story while leaving the real news unreported.
Anonymous
Tue Sep 20 2011 15:59
Article in Fosters today saying that he will not have any classes until after his probation period. http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110920/GJNEWS_01/110929977
Anonymous
Tue Sep 20 2011 08:06
I can't believe how many commenters are so clearly uneducated in the area of sexual assaults, which IS what this act falls under. I guess SHARRP needs to rent out more table tops and give out more condoms...

That being said, the writer of this article completely missed the ball. You CAN'T blame the Foreign Language Department for re-hiring him because they were ordered to by law. Huddleston himself, and everyone else involved, tried to get him removed, but he sued and won. I guarantee you that UNH, faculty, and the Foreign Language Department are all just as unhappy as we students are. If you want someone to blame, blame Michael Ryan, the arbitrator, for siding with the pervert and forcing him on our school. The staff have no choice but to go along with it for fear of being sued, because even their public dissent leaves them vulnerable to a lawsuit. I'm willing to bet UNH is secretly very hopeful that we will boycott his class, because in order to get him off campus, that's literally the only option the arbitrator left us.

Anonymous
Sat Sep 17 2011 16:18
"Sending some hypocrisy at TNH"

Are you joking? Dumbest comment of all time. BDSM clubs are there because the people WANT to do that "kinky" stuff. While you may or may not disagree with what these clubs do, everyone there WANTS to be there.
With that said, I'm fairly certain that the mother and daughter did not want to see this German professor whip his penis out in front of them.

Sensing some hypocrisy at TNH
Fri Sep 16 2011 17:40
How quickly TNH forgets. It was less than two years ago, certainly when some of the present editorial chieftains were on the staff, that the paper ran this editorial:

http://www.tnhonline.com/opinion/shackle-your-judgment-bdsm-deserves-respect-1.898694#.TnPBzxycfzF

Let me quote the closing paragraph: "We don't completely defend the ideas of bondage, submissiveness and other "kinky" characteristics of BDSM because many of us feel they can be unsafe, but we also don't think it's any of our business to judge an organization just because their activities are a shock to our system"

Anonymous
Thu Sep 15 2011 23:32
We are not missing "large facts and factors" here about why he has been allowed to return to teaching. The article on page 5 of the paper lays it out pretty clearly: an arbitrator ruled that Professor Larkin's conduct did not reach the level of "..... deliberate neglect of duty or moral delinquency of a grave order." The union fought for Professor Larkin because of the precedent that might be set.

I find it strange though that the UNH faculty is supporting the return of a Professor who would certainly make the majority of students sitting in his class very uncomfortable. Checking the UNH web site I found the following:

The University System of New Hampshire has a longstanding commitment to providing a safe workplace and a comfortable learning environment for students and employees.

Apparently that commitment to providing a "comfortable learning environment" is being overlooked. If Professor Larkin were an employee in any typical fortune 50 company he would be gone. As it is he is protected by a contract that was poorly negotiated by the UNH administrators responsible for working with the union to draw it up. At a minimum the University has a responsibility to find a position for Professor where he can finish out his career doing something other than standing in front of a class teaching.

The Chairman of the Language Department is an idiot in his support of Professor Larkin and his claim that he is an "effective and inspiring" professor. Even if this were true, and having graduated from UNH with a degree in German I cannot believe it, what Professor Larkin did has tainted him in the eyes of most students. That is the key point of the editorial and it is right.

It is regrettable that Professor Larkin behaved in such an irrational manner but to inflict him on future generations of UNH students, and thereby creating an environment where learning is particularly uncomfortable for many students, is plain out wrong. On a personal level it is sad for him and his family. He is not going to be able to move to a new university given his history so UNH is basically stuck with him until retirement. There should be something that the university can find for him to do that renders some service in an administrative position rather than a teaching position. Is that too much to ask?

Anonymous
Thu Sep 15 2011 19:24
it's a penis, really. grow up.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 15 2011 19:23
who cares? seriously...
Anonymous
Thu Sep 15 2011 18:34
Good editorial. Great headline.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 15 2011 08:30
It seems to me that the sight of a penis has never actually caused cancer, or any kind of terminal malady. it's just a part of male body. The scary part is the thought that this guy might actually do something harmful. So, we punish him for scaring us, even if he never does something actually harmful.

And, there IS a gender aspect of this. We like women's bodies; we don't like male bodies. Women get approval for showing their bodies off; men get arrested. Maybe it's time we stop criminalizing male bodies.

I know, next to nobody will agree with me. So it goes. I'm just tired of people never noticing how much we idolize women, in these times, and demonize men.

Anonymous
Thu Sep 15 2011 00:15
The seacoast online states that the decision to have him teach again was based on prior university contract dispute.

http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110630/NEWS/106300414/-1/NEWSMAP

The choice to reinstate him to the position was based on a matter of semantics. While it is important to take into consideration his psychological state when examining his motives for the crime, its seems to be a mute point from an administrative standpoint. The crime was committed. Presumably, under some extreme psychological strain, he was a able to bring himself to act in such a way. No matter what evaluations took place post-sentencing, there is no guarantee that he would not act similarly if he were again in duress. As a matter of fact, the evidence points to the contrary. Many people experience sever psychological trauma and do not respond by sexually harassing innocent bystanders. Regardless of his mental state at the time of the crime, his actions show what he is capable of. Any administrator that allows him to be in a classroom environment again is needlessly putting students in a potentially compromising situation.

yonnik fg6p3faulkner
Wed Sep 14 2011 20:17
I'm with those who say the author and their tone in the article is a little too inflamatory and I'm not sure I would have full confidence in their judgement on any important matter if they were to react in this way. Possibly the author just finds anything somehow connected to sex (broadly interpreted but nonetheless connected to "sex" in particular) to be difficult to deal with in a reasoned, mature, and balance manner (or at least associated with "sex" but outside of the author's comfort zone in that sense). That said I would have no problem with the author deciding that they themself would not take a class with the teacher, or possibly trying to discourage their own child from doing so. I have a problem with the author attempting to preempt my decision in the same regard by raising a rabble about the matter.

And on a slightly different angle, I believe college-age individuals should be respected and treated as adults in all ways possible. So the author's attempt to incite emotional response by referencing parent's sending their "young daughter to college" as if we're talking about kindergarten children is doubly misguided in my view.

In sum, I'm not buying the author's "argument" and presuming their intended target was a college-associated audience (could be wrong about that, I admit) I believe the author receives a "fail" for presenting such a weak and emotionally based argument--if it were to be judged by a collective of our young adults applying their critical thinking skills. And I would hope the author would wish for college students (not to mention teachers, parents or other college associated individuals) to employ critical thinking skills. No?

Anonymous
Wed Sep 14 2011 17:25
make him wear a scarlet "P"
E.P.
Wed Sep 14 2011 15:48
I don't think it is fair to the students for the author of this piece to demand they boycott Larkin's courses. The German department is very small, and once you get past the intermediate level, there is only one section of each course, and those courses can have as few as 5 students in them. It's not like the students have much of an option, whichever professor is assigned to teach the course is who they will get. It is easy to decide everyone should boycott it, when it's not something that YOU must do yourself. Following through with this could prevent some students from completing their German majors and graduating on time. It's not like students have the luxury of paying for more semesters than they have to. I am not saying that I would feel comfortable in his course now, but it's not so easy to take an alternative course when so few are offered.

I will say that Larkin was a very good professor when I had him 3 years ago, and that everyone I know who knows him was very shocked. That said, I don't agree that the "teaching, learning, and scholarship" should be outweighing what happened.

Anonymous
Tue Sep 13 2011 20:30
"His prognosis is excellent"? "Low risk to show a recurrence of this behavior"? There IS a risk and no one will ever know if he is "cured" until it happens again. Then what?

I'm with the author - I would never send my child to UNH for $30,000+ a year to be taught by this guy.

Anonymous
Tue Sep 13 2011 17:06
The independent arbitrator's decision can be found here:

http://static.djlmgdigital.com/scn/seacoastonline/graphics/spclReports/linked/20110629_edwardLarkin.pdf

It goes into a lot of detail that we're not getting in the papers. A psychiatrist's assessment is quoted in the document:

"[M]y professional opinion is
that he is not a danger to anyone and that he is
a low risk to show a recurrence of this behavior.
His prognosis is excellent."

Anonymous
Tue Sep 13 2011 14:31
How many UNH undergrad men displayed their own junk to teenage girls in just the first three weeks of school? Just askin'.




log out