The recent announcement by the UNH chapter of AAUP of a proposed boycott of summer school, and what amounts to a request that students do the same, is simply the latest reminder that a true academic community and organized labor are fundamentally incompatible.
During my working years, I twice opposed the introduction of collective bargaining for the UNH faculty. The first time I was on the winning side. The second time, obviously, I wasn't. My reasons had to do with the assault on professionalism and dangers to the community involved, but more than anything they looked forward with fear to the almost inevitable use by the union of some kind of weapon. Unlike the case in the employer-employee relationship in an industrial setting, where strikes and other sanctions can properly and sometimes successfully be directed against corporate heads whose own economic interests are affected, sanctions by a faculty can do direct damage to only one party. That party is the students, with whom the faculty is supposed to be engaged in the common enterprise of learning. One might add the parents who pay the bills.
I am glad I retired before being subjected to compulsory financial support of the collective bargaining unit. Its most recent threat has only reinforced my continued belief that unionism is a destructive force on the campus.
Perhaps it is time for another faculty vote.
Charles E. Clark
Professor Emeritus of History
Letters: Former UNH professor speaks out against AAUP ad
Published: Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Updated: Tuesday, March 2, 2010 01:03

is a member of the 



3 comments
If I was allowed to drop the mandatory payments to the union coffers (I assume that is how the union is planning on paying people who choose to *not* teach summer school this year by the way), I would gladly do so for the opportunity to negotiate my own raise, based upon merit and what I had actually produced over the previous year.
Lets face it, the summer school boycott decision was made by less than 30 people.
The union's increasingly strident statements are rapidly degenerating into name calling, and are earning the disrespect of faculty all over campus. Its quite ridiculous.
As many others have pointed out, times are truly tough all around. For the faculty union to be spending so much time and energy on this situation (as opposed to more substantive issues such as the current hiring freeze, the amount of unsupervised teaching done by graduate students, etc.) this university would be a better place for all of the faculty.