College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Religion and College: Community of Faith

TNH Columnist

Published: Friday, November 13, 2009

Updated: Friday, November 13, 2009 04:11

 “Stay away from her, man, she’ll just try to convert you! That’s all they do, really. They say they do not care, but they will not stop trying to convince you that Jesus is real.” My friend (and guy who I generally look up to in every way) said this to me my freshman year as I explained to him that I had just met this really cool Christian girl. I laughed it off, shrugging as I thought that ultimately nobody could “convert” me in any sense of the word. I mention this because I remember clearly thinking that if I were ever to become Christian, it would be through my own volition and my own explorations into faith. At the very least, I was not about to let a woman, no matter how “cool” she was, influence my core beliefs.

But something about his statement stuck with me, and I think I have finally worked out what it was. My friend believes that though a Christian will tell you they love you for who you are and would never want to force their beliefs upon you, they ultimately will respect you and regard you less until you profess their beliefs as well. He was a religious studies minor, a philosophy major, had read the Bible and had had many discussions with friends about their beliefs.

His understanding of the Christian world view was that of an exclusive club. Unless you pass a certain core set of standards, you will not be allowed into the hearts of the people in the club. Not only that, but it is like the exclusive club only speaks a certain language to each other, and they shift to regular language when they talk to the “outsiders.”

What I have come to realize is that this is true. Being a Christian is necessarily an exclusive world-view, much the same as being an engineer is different from being an English teacher. There is absolutely no way to avoid it. Christians see other Christians (and I imagine this is the same for all other sorts of religions) through different lenses than with non-Christians. The analogy of the professions falls short, however, because in most cases, it would be as if engineers believed that engineering was far superior to English teaching and was the only “right” profession to go into. No, even more so; unless you are an engineer, your life is meaningless.

Many people have this issue with “religions” in general. How dare someone consider their world-view and beliefs to be not only righteous but necessary to living a full and meaningful life? How could they ever claim to love me as a person if they see me as another lost soul, and I know deep down that were I to become Christian, they would rejoice?

Ultimately, adherents to Christianity are necessarily put at a difficult place in their relationships to non-Christians because Jesus claims in the Bible “I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” (John 14:6, NIV) How, then, could someone relate deeply to a friend who asks them “will I go to Heaven even if I do not believe in Jesus” or “Can I not have a relationship with God outside of this man Jesus?” The answer, if the Christian believes the words of the Bible as truth (which is, of course, a Pandora’s box that we shall not peek into at the moment), is seemingly a resounding “No.”

My mind screamed out at this. That doesn’t really capture the feeling. My whole being rebelled against this notion. There, that is better.

Part of my struggle with Christianity that it offered me a set of beliefs that required me to automatically look at other people and say “I’m sorry, I may love you, but you’re wrong. You may be on the right track, but you are wrong.”

I have since found, and am so relieved to say, that this is not correct. In my experiences, the longest lasting and most real friends I have had have been Christian. Maybe that is a product of who I choose to surround myself with. But I tend toward the explanation that they are the people who have loved me the most and judged me the least, even through my most shameful times.

But there is more to it than my own personal relationships. Christian, the word, can be broken down in a few ways. Two of which are “little Christ” or “Christ follower”. The implications of this are enormous. Christians are therefore called to act as Jesus Christ acted (questions of his historicity are unimportant as Christians believe he existed and that the Bible is reliable). Any way you look at it, Christ championed community, love of thy neighbor, and judgment left to God.

A Christian who looks down upon others as inferior is one who misses the message of Christianity. A part of that message is that we are all broken people who are called to live in community with one another, forgive each other and live deeply. Most people know the parable “Let him without sin cast the first stone.” This is inherent in the teachings of Jesus.
So what is Christianity all about? What is it that I have found that differs from my friend’s interpretation, from this exclusive club?

The personal message for all of us is that we are broken people. No matter how strong we may see others or ourselves, there is something not right. This relates directly to the “void” we all feel in some way. Christians are excited (as are adherents of other faiths) because they have found a way to the perfect healing of this brokenness.

The beauty of Christianity is the community that forms from this. It is a community of openness, love, and support.

Keep asking, keep searching.

There is hope.

Sean Matthews is a senior philosophy major who found religion to be a helpful part of his life in college. In this column, he explores the idea of how religion can fit into a college student’s life, and he shares his story in hopes that you’ll find a connection with your own experience.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments

Your name
Thu Nov 19 2009 16:45
You are absolutely right about the centrality of love - it is difficult to be comfortably clicky when you are commanded to love your enemies.

Nonetheless, conservative Protestant teachings on salvation mean that one must _at_least_, as a non-negotiable, make a religious commitment to Jesus in order to avoid eternal damnation.

The words of Christ do not seem to permit this interpretation of the passage "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life, no one comes to the Father except through me..." as meaning that someone who is not a Christian is damned. The Lord elsewhere says:

“He who receives you receives Me, and he who receives Me receives Him who sent Me. 41 He who receives a prophet in the name of a prophet shall receive a prophet’s reward. And he who receives a righteous man in the name of a righteous man shall receive a righteous man’s reward. 42 And whoever gives one of these little ones only a cup of cold water in the name of a disciple, assuredly, I say to you, he shall by no means lose his reward.” (Matthew 10:14-42, New King James Version)

The response a person gives to Jesus' disciples in this passage is identical to their response to Jesus. So here, it doesn't matter whether you make a religious commitment or assent to certain propositions, only whether you love and respond to Christ when you find him, regardless of whether or not you recognize him _as_ Christ. We find similar statements elsewhere. "When did we see you and clothe you?" those who are being vindicated at the Resurrection ask Jesus. "Whatever you did to the least of these my brethren, you did to me." etc. Seeing that the Pauline epistles affirm that Christ is not merely a human being, but God, a divine Person, and that he "holds all things together" as God (even while yet clothed in our humanity), it would seem to follow that the one who "holds all things together" is also manifest hiddenly in all things, as C.S. Lewis said, "he is everywhere incognito." This does not _contradict_ the passage about Christ being the Way, etc. - it only means that the conservative Protestant interpretation of that passage is not even in keeping with the Gospels, much less the Tradition of the Church.

Sean Matthews
Sun Nov 15 2009 03:54
First, thank you for the positive comments.

As for saying it doesn't require a negative value judgment, "you are wrong", I was not intending to say that in the article. Where does that come across? (I believe that it is there, I just do not know where in the article that my wording leads to that, writers bias) I do think and believe that Christians and any people who adhere to any religious doctrines must, necessarily, look at the world and say "that is wrong".

There is a difference though. Saying "you are wrong" is saying a few things that I do not think any individual has any right to say to another... (so this is me making a simple idea just that much more complex). Jesus said to the pharisees, to the people in the temple courtyard, and to a few others, that they were wrong or mistaken. Yet we also know that we must leave ultimate judgment up to God and Jesus. What I believe the better way to approach people is to make a distinction between the act and a personal attack. THAT is wrong is going to say "those actions, those intentions, those words, those practices" are wrong. This wording invites conversation, which invites others into exploring the love that God and Jesus offers.

Perhaps this is being PC, but I think this is being understanding of the impact of our words. If we decide to say "You are wrong," we seem condescending, stand-offish, and closed-minded. Instead, we say "hold on, that doesn't seem right to me." or "that's wrong because of x, y, and z". If you don't mind passing your own form of ultimate judgment on others, feel free to use "You are wrong" freely. I personally choose to question the act, intentions, and ideas rather than the person. After all, I am imperfect, and would prefer someone to point out my imperfect thoughts or actions, so that I can delve deep into my own deep imperfections without someone personally attacking.

Slavery, by the way, is inherent in the Bible. Straight up says "slaves obey your masters". But ultimately the slavery of two-thousand years ago in those areas of the world was much different than the slave trade you are referencing (at least, that's what I understand).

Thanks again, and God bless.

J.Kru
Sat Nov 14 2009 14:48
You are absolutely right that Christianity does not leave space for pride or feelings of superiority. It took nothing less than the death of the Son of God to make me acceptable before God! How could I feel superior?

At the same time, you are absolutely wrong that Christianity does not require you to look at people and say "You are wrong." Jesus with the Pharisees? Church discipline? God's judgment? Any Christian, faced with the idea that adultery doesn't hurt the spouse if they don't find out about it, must say "You are wrong." Faced with the idea that one race is inherently superior or inferior to another must say "You are wrong." Slavery was abolished because Christians said "You are wrong." If abortion is ever abolished, it will be because it is wrong, and Christians said so.

Best article so far.







log out