Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Out-of-state students to maintain voting rights

Associated Press

Published: Monday, September 24, 2012

Updated: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 16:02

 

CONCORD — A judge on Monday cleared the way for out-of-state college students to continue voting in New Hampshire, ordering the state to change its new voter registration form before the November elections.

Students traditionally have been allowed to declare the state their home without holding legal residency, which involves an intent to stay for an extended period of time. And in 1972, a federal judge ruled that the state could not forbid out-of-state students from voting in New Hampshire, even if they planned to leave after graduation.

But under a law passed this year, new voters would have been required to sign a statement saying they declare New Hampshire their home and are subject to laws that apply to all residents, including laws requiring drivers to register cars and get a New Hampshire driver’s license. The statement doesn’t specifically require students to be residents, but makes them subject to hundreds of laws involving residency.

 

Strafford County Superior Court Judge John Lewis ordered the state to issue new voter registration forms without that paragraph, saying it was at odds with state law and would have a ‘‘clear, harmful effect’’ on the voting rights of college students and others.

The law, which was passed over Democratic Gov. John Lynch’s veto, was challenged by the League of Women Voters of New Hampshire and four students represented by the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union.

‘‘We are very pleased the judge agreed with our concern that students who come to college in New Hampshire might give up their right to vote because of concerns about registering a car and getting a New Hampshire driver’s license even when they knew they would leave after graduation,’’ said Joan Flood Ashwell, election law specialist for the League of Women Voters of New Hampshire.

Republican House Speaker Bill O’Brien criticized the ruling, saying it takes away the rights of state residents by allowing non-residents to decide presidential, state and local elections.

‘‘When individuals find themselves in New Hampshire and know they will leave, they should not vote here,’’ he said. ‘‘Legislating otherwise from the bench to say there are two classes of voters — all of us who reside in New Hampshire and those residents of other states who choose to vote here because we are a battleground state — is judicial activism of the worst sort.’’

Noting that the legislation had the support of Secretary of State Bill Gardner, Senate President Peter Bragdon said it was unfortunate that the ruling made it easier for out-of-state residents to vote in New Hampshire.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Donna
Sat Oct 20 2012 11:52
Can non citizen students from other countries vote in NH and/or federal elections?
Jeff B
Fri Sep 28 2012 14:21
Angry Alum:

They do live here. They spend at least nine months every year in NH. If they are Juniors or Seniors they've spent more time in NH than their home states since the last election. Many of them rent houses in local towns, support local businesses, are directly effected by decisions in Concord. Why shouldn't they have a say? If they care more about their home state they can get an absentee ballot, but to say they have nothing riding on elections in NH is willfully ignorant. It's also pretty insulting to say "if they don't like it they can go back." NH as a state should be as accommodating as possible so it can lure educated workers to the Granite State, not educate them for four years and then throw them out.

Angry Alum
Wed Sep 26 2012 18:52
It is unfortunate that this judge could not see the harm that this ruling is actually doing. Why should people who do not actually live in the state be able to vote here. The votes that they cast can seriously change how much the actual tax paying residents of the state will end up paying. If they want to vote to change things in this state then they need to make a commitment to pay for these changes. The new law does not stop them from being able to partake in the federal elections, they can still cast an absentee ballot. But they should not be able to decide who is going to represent citizens of a state when they themselves are not actual citizens. It is supposed to be reprententation of the people who are citizens of a state and not representation of people who only go to college in a state. If these students do not like it then they can go back to their state and go to school there. College students quit your whining, go take a class on the foundations of the Constitution.
Anonymous
Tue Sep 25 2012 07:24
Hurray! It is good to see the impetus to impede voting rights in NH was stopped on this front!




log out