Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

UNH experts weigh in on climate change conference

Staff Writer

Published: Monday, December 7, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, December 8, 2009 00:12

Copenhagen

Courtesy of Mark Fahnestock

Residents of Greenland experience climate change firsthand, according to UNH researcher Mark Fahnestock.


When the representatives of 192 countries gather in Copenhagen in the next two weeks for the United Nation's Climate Change Conference, they will be debating a global response to a great deal of scientific data, including some compiled by Mark Fahnestock, a glaciologist and research associate professor within UNH's Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space (EOS).

Fahnestock is the co-author of the chapter on Greenland in the "Snow, Water, Ice, and Permafrost in the Arctic" (SWIPA) report. This report will be released at the conference on Dec. 14, along with a 20-minute corresponding video, which Fahnestock appears in.

"The report captures a bunch of different information of what is changing in Greenland [due to climate change] and tries to make it coherent," Fahnestock said.

The United Nations (UN) Climate Change Conference, officially known as COP15 in reference to it being the 15th gathering of the UN's Conference of Parties, began yesterday in Copenhagen, Denmark, and continues until Dec. 18. The goal of the conference is to develop a global framework for climate change mitigation.

According to Robert Mohr, associate professor of economics at UNH, the debate over whether global warming is real or not is effectively over.

"The remaining real question is what to do about it, and that's an economics question," said Mohr, who will be teaching an upper-level economics course on the economics of climate change in the spring that will include a trip to Copenhagen over spring break.

While there is debate over whether a framework for climate change mitigation will actually emerge from the conference, Fahnestock said he is "cautiously optimistic." However, he sees the conference itself as a positive sign.

"I think it's clear that every country is engaged, and that's different from the past," Fahnestock said.

However, Scott Ollinger, associate professor of natural resources and earth system science, said the problem is simply too big to be solved at Copenhagen.

"It's become clear in the weeks leading up to the meeting that an agreement that's ambitious enough to solve the climate change problem won't be reached in Copenhagen," Ollinger said. "At this point in history, the two most important nations are China and the United States, and both are still far from the kind of commitment that's needed."

Mohr said that the conference may not live up to everyone's high expectations for it, but will hopefully be a step in the right direction.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

7 comments

Jim
Fri Dec 18 2009 13:24
I am so happy to know that my daughter who is a freshman in the UNH Environmental Conservation program is getting an unbiased, scientific view of climate change.....LOL. I may have to rethink paying for her tuition.
Your name
Fri Dec 11 2009 16:41
The next time Al Gore claims that some scientist questioning AGW is bought and paid for by the oil companies it might behoove us all to ask "How many millions do you stannd to make from carbon trading Mr. Gore?"

Oh and it's nice to see that at a University of over 15,000 students an article like this discussing one of the most pressing issues of the day generated a whopping 5 comments.

You have grow up sometime people. Might as well be now. Beleive it or not you can't go on sleeping until noon, getting drunk and/or high every other day, and living off of mommy and daddy's dime forever!

Kate
Thu Dec 10 2009 11:50
First, I think global warming is a "misnomer," people will think that it will get warmer EVERYWHERE on Earth, instead of what it actually is- that the whole Earth collectively/overall gets warmer. People have a very hard time separating weather from climate- if just one week (or even a month) has below average temperature, suddenly that's basis that GLOBAL warming is not real. But whether or not climate change is real doesn't fix the fact that our main sources of energy are not renewable, ie they are finite, that is, the supply is limited. Just to please those that don't believe in what most scientists believe in (just today over 1700 scientists* have said climate change is real and brought on upon by humans), they should drop the whole global warming jargon, and instead focus on energy sources that have infinite supply. Oil has a finite supply, we have past the peak or are nearing the peak of oil supply, just do search on Hubbert's Peak to see that this so-called "liberal" issue isn't so partisan or fake. One of the staunchest republicans in Congress has kept warning about Hubbert's Peak, this is not a "liberal/fake" issue.

Do we really want our economy based on an energy source that will run out so soon? We saw what happened when gasoline prices went up to near $5, do we really want such a fuel source for our economy?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091210/ap_on_sc/climate_hacked_e_mails;_ylt=AgtSA.iaN23SBtaI24UTgkoPLBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJuY3M2NnVlBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkxMjEwL2NsaW1hdGVfaGFja2VkX2VfbWFpbHMEY3BvcwMyBHBvcwM3BHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcnkEc2xrAzE3MDB1a3NjaWVudA--

Mark
Wed Dec 9 2009 18:08
The debate is over? The debate would have would have to begun and taken place in order for it to have been finished.

Gloabal warming, government healthcare, the UN, the Federal reserve. They're all just tools in the New World Order's agenda and it's nice to see UNH professors supporting it. Boy am I glad I'm no longer a student here.

Al Gore is the biggest con man in the history of the nation and it's a shame that the average college student, lapping up the propaganda from their professors is to dumb to open their eyes to the truth.

Your name
Tue Dec 8 2009 13:42
Don't listen to the eco freaks. Please

AnneM

John L Jones
Tue Dec 8 2009 12:15
I would also like to offer this article concerning the future of "carbon credits," brought to you by the same people who designed the Credit Default Swaps which recently decimated our economy. http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/12/guest-post-woman-who-invented-credit-default-swaps-is-one-of-the-key-architects-of-carbon-derivatives-which-would-be-at-the-very-center-of-cap-and-trade.html
John L Jones
Tue Dec 8 2009 12:12
Well it's good to see that UNH professors are questioning conventional wisdom... not! All of the opinions offered in this article rest on the supposition that climate change is anthropogenic in nature. We are being herded along the path of scientific positivism that has decimated free people in the past. The science on global warming is not settled, no matter how badly academics partial to either side of the debate want to assume it is. Making policy decisions that will drastically affect the world community based on unconfirmed theories (remember, the US gov't was warning people about global cooling in the 1970's...) is a fool's errand. I have one question to ask: What impacts will these rash, reactionary policies have on human freedom?






log out